Thursday, March 27, 2008

Leave the Olympics alone

I wish people would leave China alone. Instead of thinking ahead to this summer's Beijing Olympics, all we are hearing about is China's ruthless colonial dealings in Tibet, its lack of democracy, its human rights failings, &c., and how it should be boycotted, snubbed, insulted or at least lectured on its evil ways.

But sport is not an effective vehicle for politics.

First, because the only people who are really hurt by political boycotts are the athletes themselves, who spend so much time and money and energy preparing for competition. China is not going be hurt in the same way: it is a proud and ancient country, and is not going to be bullied into submission by western moralising, right or wrong. Hu Jintao and Wen Jiabao are not going to wake up one morning and think, gosh, Bush and Brown say we're being nasty to Tibet, let's give them independence right away, get the Dalai Lama on the phone.

Second, once you establish the principle that global sports meetings can be boycotted on political grounds, there's no end to it—and probably no more Olympics either. No country on earth is 100 per cent virtuous, not even the US. Some countries won't want to compete with American athletes because of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and renditions and the Iraq invasion. Some will avoid British athletes because of Tony Blair's grovelling support for George Bush. The British already don't want to play cricket with the Zimbabweans because of Robert Mugabe. Next thing you know, Indians won't compete with Pakistanis, Venezuelans with Colombians, Russians with Ukranians, or Shias with Sunnis, and half the word will want to shun Israel.

There's been more than enough of that already. Since Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party politicised the summer Olympics in Berlin in 1936, there have been boycotts over Israel, the Soviet invasion of Hungary, the British attack on Suez, South African apartheid, the status of Taiwan, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, not to mention the Atlanta bomb in 1996 and the Black September assault on the Israeli contingent in Munich in 1972.

Did any of this make a difference to anything? No. Did anything change politically? No. It merely damaged sport, damaged the athletes, and damaged the Olympics themselves, which are about bringing nations closer together at a human level, not about airing political conflicts.

Let the diplomats get to work on the politics, let demonstrators besiege the embassies if they think it will do any good. But when gifted individual human beings get together to compete at the highest level, bringing rare pleasure to billions of spectators, leave them alone to get on with it.

5 Comments:

At 12:54 PM, Blogger Ursula said...

Jeremy, you made a most eloquent case why sport is indeed an effective vehicle for bringing to our attention what is going on in a world not exactly on our doorstep.

Sure, athletes should be left alone to get on with their job, but they should also take pride that - whilst chasing the next record and medal (for their own country) - they attract focus on what's going on behind the scenes.

According to Aristotle each one of us is a "zoon politicon", and that goes even for the long distance runner. We cannot, nor should we, compartmentalize our lives.

On a stylistic note, Jeremy, in your fourth paragraph, to my amusement, you vividly describe what takes place on school playgrounds all over the world.

You state that none of those antics make any difference. Of course they do, otherwise you wouldn't be writing about them.

So, what's your best on the 100 m?

U

 
At 1:45 PM, Blogger JT said...

Ursula,

You mean we would never have heard about events in Tibet if it weren't for the imminent Olympics? I don't think so. Mangled monks make a good story any time: Burma was Olympic-free, after all, and we heard all about the uprisings there.

As for making a difference, I meant producing change in the situation being complained about (not just heightening the awareness of one ancient & cynical hack). If Britain bans Zimbabwe's cricketers, is that in itself going to bring down Mugabe? If Sarkozy or Pelosi boycott all or part of the Olympics, is that going to start communism crashing down? I don't think so. And now that news and information are so easily spread (and not just by mainstream media), we really don't need political melodramas and posturing to make the world aware of what's going on. (The Chinese themselves ensured that the whole world heard and saw the Tibetan protests anyway, by their response, thus shooting themselves in both feet, Olympics or no Olympics.)

Let people do their sport, and let's have at least one politics-free zone left in the world.

(With due respect to Aristotle, of course. I'm not sure he meant "political" in exactly our modern sense.)

 
At 3:45 PM, Blogger Ursula said...

Jeremy, I am sorry you are so angry and upset.

You say would "we" have not heard about this and the other anyway? It depends how you define "we". I do not wish to be snobbish or elitist, though no doubt that's how I come across, but fact is that it is precisely events like the olympics which draw in a much wider audience's attention to, say, another country's plight and policies. Do you know how many switch channel when everday news reels go into too much 'political' detail? Too many. I sympatize with you Jeremy, it's not palatable but it's a fact. I can only refer back to my opinion that we cannot compartmentalize our lives or if we do it is at our moral peril; I'd go as far as to say it's irresponsible.

U

 
At 5:44 PM, Blogger JT said...

Not at all, Ursula ... neither angry nor upset! In fact, pleased that the post sparked a conversation. Quite often in the past I've argued on the other side ... maybe on this occasion it was the hypocrisy of some of the moralists that p••••d me off.

 
At 10:36 AM, Anonymous Georgia said...

The one case where it seems a sporting boycott of sorts was effective in applying political pressure was the barring of South Africa from international sporting events during the 1980s.

But that was still different from boycotting the Olympics, in that affected primarily South African athletes.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home